<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Pacify or Not To Pacify!  That is the Question!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homegrownmommy.com/2009/05/18/to-pacify-or-not-to-pacify-that-is-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homegrownmommy.com/2009/05/18/to-pacify-or-not-to-pacify-that-is-the-question/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=to-pacify-or-not-to-pacify-that-is-the-question</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:34:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HomeGrown Mommy</title>
		<link>http://www.homegrownmommy.com/2009/05/18/to-pacify-or-not-to-pacify-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>HomeGrown Mommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homegrownmommy.com/?p=730#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much Heather for conributing!  It is very interesting what you mentioned about doc&#039;s advising against &quot;too much&quot; nursing but never &quot;too much&quot; pacifier.  I know from personal experience that it is too easy to rely on that pacifier all the time.  Thanks for the visit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much Heather for conributing!  It is very interesting what you mentioned about doc&#8217;s advising against &#8220;too much&#8221; nursing but never &#8220;too much&#8221; pacifier.  I know from personal experience that it is too easy to rely on that pacifier all the time.  Thanks for the visit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather D</title>
		<link>http://www.homegrownmommy.com/2009/05/18/to-pacify-or-not-to-pacify-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homegrownmommy.com/?p=730#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Something to consider with the &quot;advantage&quot; of pacifiers preventing SIDS, is what is the mechanism behind this protection?  I would think that it&#039;s because the constant sucking prevents deep sleep and maintains lighter sleep, which is supposed to be safer for babies.  Read Dr. Sears&#039; research on this for more information.

So if you don&#039;t want to use a pacifier but want to reduce the risk of SIDS, you want other methods of maintaining lighter sleep -- which include co-sleeping, and more frequent waking.  That&#039;s right, sleeping too long might mean your baby is sleeping too deeply.  Babies are supposed to wake frequently, it&#039;s quite possibly a protective mechanism until their brains are developed enough that SIDS is no longer a danger.  So instead of despairing and complaining over the lack of sleep, be grateful that your baby is awake and alive -- this kind of positive outlook on it can help get through those late-night (and early-morning) interruptions, without having to resort to plastic.

And of course it should go without saying that nursing to help sleep is preferable to plastic imitations.  It always astounds me how certain &quot;experts&quot; maintain that you shouldn&#039;t let your baby get used to nursing to sleep because then they become &quot;addicted&quot; to it and you&#039;ll &quot;never get them off&quot;, but there are no similar warnings for using pacifiers to help sleep!  All a pacifier is, is a &quot;trick&quot; to make baby think that he is getting the comfort of nursing without actually nursing.  

Another disadvantage I&#039;d like to see mentioned, is that parents all too often become overly dependent on the pacifier as a cure-all for their baby, rather than dealing with whatever the actual problem is.  Baby fusses?  Stick in the binki.  Baby spits it out?  Stick it back in.  

I&#039;ve even seen MANY times when baby wasn&#039;t even fussing at all, and parents stick it in there... why?  Just because babies are SUPPOSED to have one in their mouth all the time?  I wonder sometimes if some parents have that perception.  Little wonder it becomes so hard for these poor kids to &quot;break the habit&quot; as they get older.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something to consider with the &#8220;advantage&#8221; of pacifiers preventing SIDS, is what is the mechanism behind this protection?  I would think that it&#8217;s because the constant sucking prevents deep sleep and maintains lighter sleep, which is supposed to be safer for babies.  Read Dr. Sears&#8217; research on this for more information.</p>
<p>So if you don&#8217;t want to use a pacifier but want to reduce the risk of SIDS, you want other methods of maintaining lighter sleep &#8212; which include co-sleeping, and more frequent waking.  That&#8217;s right, sleeping too long might mean your baby is sleeping too deeply.  Babies are supposed to wake frequently, it&#8217;s quite possibly a protective mechanism until their brains are developed enough that SIDS is no longer a danger.  So instead of despairing and complaining over the lack of sleep, be grateful that your baby is awake and alive &#8212; this kind of positive outlook on it can help get through those late-night (and early-morning) interruptions, without having to resort to plastic.</p>
<p>And of course it should go without saying that nursing to help sleep is preferable to plastic imitations.  It always astounds me how certain &#8220;experts&#8221; maintain that you shouldn&#8217;t let your baby get used to nursing to sleep because then they become &#8220;addicted&#8221; to it and you&#8217;ll &#8220;never get them off&#8221;, but there are no similar warnings for using pacifiers to help sleep!  All a pacifier is, is a &#8220;trick&#8221; to make baby think that he is getting the comfort of nursing without actually nursing.  </p>
<p>Another disadvantage I&#8217;d like to see mentioned, is that parents all too often become overly dependent on the pacifier as a cure-all for their baby, rather than dealing with whatever the actual problem is.  Baby fusses?  Stick in the binki.  Baby spits it out?  Stick it back in.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve even seen MANY times when baby wasn&#8217;t even fussing at all, and parents stick it in there&#8230; why?  Just because babies are SUPPOSED to have one in their mouth all the time?  I wonder sometimes if some parents have that perception.  Little wonder it becomes so hard for these poor kids to &#8220;break the habit&#8221; as they get older.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

